The New Jersey traffic law for operating a motor vehicle during a period of license suspension provides:
a. It shall be a crime of the fourth degree to operate a motor vehicle during the period of license suspension in violation of R.S.39:3-40, if the actor’s license was suspended or revoked for a first violation of R.S.39:4-50 or section 2 of P.L.1981, c.512 (C.39:4-50.4a) and the actor had previously been convicted of violating R.S.39:3-40 while under suspension for that first offense. A person convicted of an offense under this subsection shall be sentenced by the court to a term of imprisonment.
b. It shall be a crime of the fourth degree to operate a motor vehicle during the period of license suspension in violation of R.S.39:3-40, if the actor’s license was suspended or revoked for a second or subsequent violation of R.S.39:4-50 or section 2 of P.L.1981, c.512 (C.39:4-504a). A person convicted of an offense under this subsection shall be sentenced by the court to a term of imprisonment.
c. Notwithstanding the term of imprisonment provided under N.J.S.2C:43-6 and the provisions of subsection e. of N.J.S.2C:44-1, if a person is convicted of a crime under this section the sentence imposed shall include a fixed minimum sentence of not less than 180 days during which the defendant shall not be eligible for parole.
In a recent case impacting New Jersey traffic law, State v. Harris, a NJ appeals court held that motorists convicted of violations under subsection b. of this statute are not allowed to serve their jail sentences under home supervision or alternative programs. At the trial level, the defendants in these consolidated cases were found guilty of violating this subsection b. of the statute, but were sentenced to home detention. In overturning the trial courts’ decisions, the appellate court held that sentences to noncustodial alternative programs instead of jail under the statute is illegal.